September 26, 2005

The Em-Per-Or Strikes back

Per Hoffman, founder of Adcandy sent this note to me, following my critique of AdCandy on Jaffe Juice.

"Believe me...I'm probably going to be the last person to call out any CGC-driven work"

Gimme a break! Obviously, you're not "the last person to call out CGC...", and obviously you're don't really "appreciate an irreverent approach." . Adcandy may be flawed, but calling it "bad" without any real justification, besides being "contrived," reeks of sour grapes. I find it amusing that traditional marketers, who make a lot of their living selling the public a bunch of BS and empty promises, become suddenly idealistic in their opposition to Adcandy.

If you truly believe what you say, that CGC has some value, and that you appreciate and irreverent approach, why don't you offer some constructive suggestions to improve the basic concept of Adcandy.

I'm all ears....

Here's my response to him:

Per - thanks for the note. I love your passion.

Kudos to you for your press in Wired btw. Really has put you on the Map.

Maybe you got me on a bad day...I was in London at the time and a bit jet-lagged. In my defence, I have sung your business praises to Adweek. You were the first to put a business model to this.

I still am not quite sure it sits well with me...not sour grapes, just bad digestive fluids. The thrust and power of CGC is its organic nature. Putting a structure or process to it...however informal and a dollar value to boot is really what I'm reserving judgement on. PS - I do know a good designer if you're looking ;)

I do wish you all the best and luck in the world and will certainly make mention of this on an upcoming podcast of Across the Sound. I will and intend to give credit whenever it's due.

jJ

comments Permalink
Comment Total: (1)

SPONSORSHIP

Jaffe Juice – brings a fresh new marketing perspective and commentary from industry thought leader and author Joseph Jaffe. Click here to find out more about sponsorship opportunities.

Jaffe Juice continues below...

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/307546/3254710

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Em-Per-Or Strikes back:

Comments

hey Joe- I've gotta call you on this:
"The thrust and power of CGC is its organic nature. Putting a structure or process to it...however informal and a dollar value to boot is really what I'm reserving judgement on."
I'd say the thrust and power of CGC is that it's made by and/or features non-agency consumers...it provides a new voice. Trying to find a way to compensate that voice (and give it access to branding) is certainly a valid business model. And for the record, I had a business model for this first:
http://www.cobrandit.com/

Posted by: owen mack

Post a comment