June 05, 2009

JJTV #18 - Sprint finally gets it right

After the Dan Hesse bluff, Sprint leaves the wireless revolution and focuses on the NOW. Even thought they kind of cheated, kudos to them on a great effort.

Spread the word:




Links:

  • Now network spot
  • Dan Hesse / Wireless revolution spot
  • Did you know video

January 22, 2009

Is a 1-second ad 30x more or less effective than 1 x 30-second spot?

1-22-2009 1-15-43 PM Last year, Miller High Life kicked Budweiser's overpriced ass with the most perfect brandjacked piece of creative ever

This year, they're trying again...this time - instead of using YouTube and the like - by buying around the Big Game, instead of in it. And oh by the way, with a series of Epilepsy inducing 1-second spots.

To me this represents the old, "once is witty, twice is shitty" adage. Put differently, most people's (including mine) reaction is a vigorous head nod, but the more you think about it, the less it makes sense.

Of course, this goes against the message itself and makes me think of two previous/similar Stupid Bowl attempts: 1) e-Trade's "we just wasted $2M on a Super Bowl spot, what are you doing/where you are you putting your money?" (Answer: hopefully not with you) and 2) Fedex's 10 tips how to create the perfect Super Bowl spot (Answer: tip #11: by esoterically talking to yourselves)

I will say that this is the ONLY spot in, near or around this year's Stupid Bowl that I'm even vaguely or remotely aware of. It appears that blogger/influencer outreach has hit an all time low in terms of activity/commitment.

What do you think? And while you're thinking, here are Brogan's thoughts

January 21, 2009

The greatest piece of research....ever!

...but seriously, quite possibly the dumbest piece of research.....EVER!!!

According to a Gallup & Robinson study of 12 years' worth of surveys about recall and likeability of advertising that appears in the annual pigskin classic, there is a direct relationship between the confidence people have in the economy and the attention they pay to Super Bowl commercials.


I can't even begin to go into how completely useless this information is.

Talk amongst yourselves. I'll give you a topic....attention in Super Bowl commercials is going down:
a) because people are drunk out of their minds
b) because people hate advertising
c) because people have the volume turned down and are having a party at the same time
d) because watching the commercials on YouTube and/or listening to Donny Deutsch on the Today Show was witty once....but now is shitty
e) because the creative product sucks
f) because of too much clutter
g) because they're not in the least bit in "buying mode"
g) because they're worried about paying the mortage
h) all of the above...except for g)

January 12, 2009

Only poor people watch 30-second spots

A while back I noted what I thought was a earth shattering observation, at least 50% of American Idol's audience were over 50 years old. Put differently, not only were audience numbers in a nosedive, they (the audience) were also getting older...

Now it appears that they're also poorer (relatively speaking)

A new survey suggests that upscale households account for a disproportionate slice of the DVR distribution pie, as more than half of all U.S. homes with incomes of $100,000+ subscribe to some form of time-shifting device.


Old + Poor. Not exactly the 1-2 punch marketers were looking for.

February 04, 2008

Jaffe Juice #103 - Monday Morning Ad Quarterback

Super bowl reflections "as a consumer", followed by a series of "live" call-ins from a bunch of listeners, including Eric Cedo, Jay Berkowitz, Ask a Copywriter, Zena Weist, Roman Vinoly and Jim Nail. Audio comments to +1 206 203-3255.

Direct download here
iTunes subscription here

Enjoy!

Jaffe Juice taking "live" call-ins this morning

Update: Thanks to all who called in. The show is now officially done! (no more calls)

I'm recording my annual Super (AKA Stupid) Bowl edition of Jaffe Juice this morning. If you'd like to call in your reflections and Winners & Losers, here are the details:

Time: 10am EST
Number: +1 203 285-8725

Note: Due to the fact I have no switchboard, nor producer....if you call and it just rings or goes to voice mail, try back in 2 minutes. I'll take your call as a cue to wind down the current caller.

If you need more details or want to use a different method, just e-mail me: jaffe at getthejuice dot com

January 17, 2008

I'm friends with 60-minute's Lesley Stahl

After seeing Marc Zuckerberg helping 60-minutes' Lesley Stahl set up her Facebook profile, I friended her and today she accepted my offer. As of posting this, she has 604 friends.

My question to you is whether you think that's a little or a lottle (as I say to my son), given the power of Prime Time broadcast TV.

PS She's a Scrabulous player, but might not be for long...

January 04, 2008

Huckabee 15: Romney 1

Mitt Romney outspent Mike Huckabee by as much as 15:1 and yet lost to Huck in this week's Iowa Caucus.

I always like to point out the obvious in today's market, which is that outspending (as opposed to outsmarting) is no longer enough to break through the clutter, engage and resonate, and deliver the ultimate ROI.

(on soapbox)
I hate the fact that in this country's political landscape, so much emphasis is placed on outspending and in particular, in Television advertising. Perhaps this is a small sign of things to come i.e. that the American people are smart enough to make their own minds up, use the democratizing Internet and most importantly, the wisdom of their own community, as opposed to be beaten over the head with insulting and manipulative, warped advertising.
(off soapbox)

Sure, there will be enough defenders of the 30-second spot (and by default, the status quo)  that are quick to give 1,000 reasons why in fact Mike Huckabee prevailed and/or Mitt Romney did not. These same pundits would have had completely different stories if the results had been reversed.

I'm not getting into ideologies, platforms, personalities or campaign strategies and to be honest I have no idea who the better candidate is between the two. I just think it's important to remind an industry that is infamous for beating dead horses that sometimes the stench can overpower and knock you out.

Hollywood is particularly arrogant and guilty when it comes to this kind of warped logic. I recently spoke with a Hollywood exec (from another studio) who made me want to barf when they shifted the blame from Nicole Kidman and Daniel Craig's bomb, Invasion, to EVERYTHING OTHER than its media spend.

It goes without saying that poor products should receive poor media support...if only this was the case.

September 25, 2007

Life after the 30-second spot?

FirebrandYesterday I bumped into an old friend, Todd Herman, at Pershing Square. We reminisced about the time he called on me at TBWA\Chiat\Day about an idea he had to essentially create a portal for advertising. Although I mentioned to him my skepticism about whether people would voluntarily watch ads, I mentioned to him that this idea could single-handedly give the ad industry the shot in the arm it so badly needed.

Over the years that followed, I saw countless imitators attempt to get similar ideas off the ground, but they never did.

And then YouTube came along and offered up another short term solution to a much larger problem i.e. the opportunity for ads to enjoy a new lease on life e.g. doing its best to justify the gargantuan Super Bowl spends for at least 3-5 days before and after the fact.

And now, we get to see one of crayon's clients, Firebrand strut its stuff and test the hypothesis that advertising in context is really not the serial offender we thought it to be. Actually that's not Firebrand's mission per se - Firebrand believes in the power of commercial culture or put differently, the fact that commercials are inextricably part of pop culture. Whazzzup? You tell me :)

When I first walked into the Firebrand conference room, I came head-to-head with Roman Vinoly, co-founder of Firebrand. I knew I liked him straight away because we challenged each other throughout the meeting and when I handed him a copy of "Life after the 30-second spot", he didn't throw it back at me which was a good sign. In fact, we had more in common than one might have thought and at the core, there was the fervent belief that great storytelling would always have a place.

Roman took that one step further. He made sure that great storytelling or even great advertising had a home. That home is Firebrand.

In short, Firebrand will house and curate the best of the best and, by surrounding the Apple's, Nike's, Sony's of the world with layers of interactivity, incentivization and conversation, maybe...just maybe...the 30-second spot and its richer (60+ sec) and poorer (15 secs) cousins will enjoy a new lease on life.

Here's some more information, courtesy of Greg's blog:

It's a new, opt-in entertainment and marketing destination that gives consumers interactive access to their favorite brands, products and promotions.  They program the best and coolest TV commercials the way MTV used to program music videos (with "Commercial Jockeys," even - think MTV's vee-jays with a serious jones for good ads) and are slated to be the first multi-platform network to "go live" simultaneously on television, the web and mobile.

What's the difference between YouTube and Firebrand? For one thing...ironically....clutter. YouTube is - at best - an interim solution, which favors "viral" i.e. exceptions to the norm; Firebrand on the other hand is self-contained and offers a focused and singular alternative solution. Is it for everyone? Of course not. Commercials as commercials are a losing value proposition, but permission-based commercials (laden with offers and adjacent relevant and utilitarian information) are arguably closer to being consumed as content.

In LA30, I introduced R.U.E. - Relevance, Utility and Entertainment (could also be called Engagement I guess) As far as Firebrand is concerned, it's all inside...

This morning was the official Firebrand pre-launch, which the crayonistas attended. So did Daryl Ohrt from Plaid and Brandflakes for Breakfast. All that's left for me to say is best of luck and don't forget to check them out and judge for yourselves. Sign up here to be alerted when Firebrand launches (October 22nd)

Here are some additional links for your browsing pleasure:

August 17, 2007

Mitt Romney loves 30-second spots

Reading through an old Ad Age (July 9th) and I stumbled upon this blurb:

Mitt Romney leads the 2008 presidential candidates in TV ad spending, shelling out for 4,549 spots in local markets

...what a great opportunity to compare this spend to its ultimate ROI. So, if Mitt Romney is President of the United States of America come November 2008, I'll write a new book titled, "I was just kidding...the 30-second spot rocks" and if not, I'll just re-tag this post under "I told you so"

One more thing...should this not work out, we can always fall back on blaming the creative :)

I work at

Speaking


  • Hire Joseph Jaffe to speak at your conference or event

JaffeJuiceTV

Contact me

  • If you would like to make contact with me, please see the About page.

Join the Conversation

Life After 30

Subscribe

Search


  • spotlight

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    Twitter

    • TwitterCounter for @jaffejuice

    Grab the Podcast

    • Across the sound Subscribe to Jaffe Juice – The New Marketing Podcast via iTunes

    License

    • Creative Commons License

    Send a video message

    Welcome

    • to the reincarnated and reinvigorated Jaffe Juice. What was once a weekly op-ed column is now an unshackled, uncensored and uninhibited dialogue on the subjects of new marketing, advertising and creativity.
    Blog powered by TypePad