I have to rant. I just read an article citing the release of a new Toilet & Douche study against the headline, "Old Media still resonate".
I could write an entire post on the headline alone...beginning with the fact that the new name for traditional media is now "old" media. Gee, how sexy does that sound? Well the good news is that your billions of dollars of legacy investment still has some value and that you're not throwing it away in its entirety. At least you can sleep with a tiny bit of conscience that you're not completely incompetent and negligent in your responsibilities (or lack thereof)
The study was conducted amongst 13-75 year olds, which already is ridiculous. These days, there are seas of difference between 13 and 17 year olds, let alone comparing practically 3 generations in 1 study.
...consistent across all generational
segmentsâmillennials (13-24), Gen Xers (25-41), boomers, (42-60) and
matures (61-75)ânearly three-quarters of consumers said they enjoy
magazines even though they acknowledge being able to read the same
publications online.
WTF? I'm surprised 25% of people don't enjoy reading magazines. Let's talk about incidence shall we? Or how about whether people enjoy paying versus reading free magazines? And while we're at it, how about making the distinction between content and advertising?
...the "resilience of old media" remains a prominent
feature of the landscape. "And one of the main activities online is
going to a television Web site," he said. The survey found that 46
percent of consumers do that regularly, including over half (52
percent) of all Gen Xers.
This is what you want to focus on and use as your poster child for the resilience of old media i.e. the fact consumers go to websites of their favorite TV shows (most of which are embarrassingly lousy) How about focusing on the resiliency of all the magazines that are shutting down or the continued hemorrhaging of newspaper readership.
"Television is still a core activity...even though we see the expected amounts of online, text messaging,
cellphone use [and] gamesâconsumers are doing more things, but still
watching television. It is always on."
Television is BACKGROUND noise. The Web is always on. TV is comfort food that just makes you fat and lazy. Come on...when every legitimate organization and study is reflected on cataclysmic change with respect to the demise of old media and the rise of new media, how can we be talking about TV as the rock and grounding force of media?
...there was also an unexpected result regarding
digital video recording devices such as TiVo. "It's the Xers and
boomers that rely on DVRs for television use," he said. "But the
number-one use for DVR is not commercial skipping."
What's unexpected about this? DVR's are not purchased to skip ads, but to give their owners a more evolved holistic viewing experience. Lofty words I know, but it's more about digital versus analog, as opposed to illegal downloading of music versus purchasing a CD if you get my drift.
The rest of the piece is unreadable, including nuggets such as "overall there was more receptivity to print ads than to Internet advertising"...er that's because it's so easy just to ignore a static ad that's been around for as long as the people responsible for this survey (ok, maybe not as long)
Look. If you're desperate for some validation that the status quo is still hunky dory, then maybe this blog isn't for you. At the end of the day, I've never said "old media is dead" and/or "you should invest everything into new media or even new marketing", but I do get rather pissy when people are so intent on perpetuating a failing business model, as opposed to figuring out how to evolve it.
Recent Comments