Iâve never been wholly convinced that MSM will succeed at blogging. Itâs one thing to allow readers to comment, but itâs another thing to task potty-trained reporters, who chomp at the bit with the publisher-editor relationship, to blog with freedom, independence and a degree of irreverence.
Take my new best friend, Linda Tischler, who felt the urge to critique both Advertising Week and my panel in her blog post.
Letâs dissect her profound prose:
I just got back from a panel on the future of the 30-second spot, which could have been interesting except for the fact that the moderator (that would be me), in what must have been payback for help on his new book (are you saying that these panelists contributed to my book, paid for it or endorsed it in any way â because if you are, youâd be wrong.), assembled a panel of six talking heads (as opposed to?), and then lobbed questions that each answered in turn (âer thatâs called a panel Q&A). Had this been a 30-second spot, I would have TIVOed through it in a heartbeat. (drumroll please)
There must be a better way to deliver information from experts and pundits than the tedious panel. Anybody seen any formats that are more appealing? This industry could use some fresh ideas.
OK, Lindaâ¦what exactly are you so upset about? Are you lamenting on the panel format in general or specifically something about my panel? Why did you not have the courage to ask a question to the panelists or myself? If you were unhappy with either the line of questioning or the responses in general, why did you not stand up and voice your opinion?
Recent Comments